On 14th August, the Tonbridge Courier reported
that a homosexual couple were being harassed in Tonbridge town centre. Not only
were they verbally abused in a manner that was vitriolic but they had also been
spat at.
Their friends rallied round and arranged for a Gay Pride
demonstration to support them. Organised
at short notice (a week or less) the demonstration attracted a turnout of 170
odd which for a small town like Tonbridge (population approx 36,000 and a high proportion
of commuters) is impressive. It was a friendly and happy occasion.
That was the high point – now for the depressing event. A
local business man decided he wanted to start a new pro-European Union political
party: nothing wrong with that. However, he also expressed a desire to ban
homosexuals from membership and to base the party on ‘biblical principles’.
Luckily three of us got letters printed in the local press rejecting
his actions and stressing the tolerant Tonbridge
Extract from my own letter below:
“In 2010 the Human
Rights and Equality Commission took the BNP to court for clauses in their
constitution which prohibited non-whites from joining their party. The
Commission won the case and the BNP were forced to rewrite their constitution.
They were also forced to remove the clause which stipulated that party
applicants should oppose 'any form of integration or assimilation of ... the indigenous
British’. So this means Mr. Hayward will not be able to include homophobic
policy aims in his proposed constitution, as such discrimination is not
permissible for a political party.
Acceptance of
diversity is
normal behaviour and gross intolerance has no place in our town.”